Steganography Detection

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for detecting potential steganography use to hide content in computer files transmitted via electronic communications are provided. An electronic communication associated with a computer file may be identified. The communication and the computer file may be analyzed to determine whether the computer file potentially includes hidden content. To determine whether the computer file potentially includes hidden content, a set of steganographic criteria may be analyzed. If at least a portion of the steganographic criteria are satisfied, then it may be determined that the computer file potentially includes hidden content. If at least a portion of the steganographic criteria are not satisfied, then it may be determined that the computer file does not potentially include hidden content. If the computer file is determined to potentially include hidden content, an individual may be notified of the communication associated with the computer file.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to steganography and relates inparticular to the detection of steganography through an analysis of acomputer file associated with an electronic communication.

BACKGROUND

Steganography is the practice of hiding messages or other content suchthat the existence of the hidden message or content is unknown to anyoneexcept the sender and the recipient. Steganography differs fromcryptography in that the existence of an encrypted message may be knownothers beyond the sender and recipient. While cryptography providessecurity though obfuscation, steganography may provide security throughconcealment. As encrypted messages are vulnerable to cryptanalysistechniques to decode an encrypted message, cryptography may be combinedwith steganography such that the existence of the encrypted messageitself goes undetected. Steganographic techniques may include hidingmessages in computer-based image files, audio files, video files, andother types of computer files.

While steganography may be advantageously employed to exchange securecommunications, it may also be employed to surreptitiously transmitsensitive or confidential information. Organizations that deal insensitive or confidential information are dedicated to maintaining theprivacy of such information. Therefore, these organizations may beinterested in steganalysis techniques to detect the use ofsteganography.

Steganalysis refers to the detection of steganography used to hidemessages or other content. Although research has been conducted intodeveloping steganalysis techniques there remains room for improvement.In particular, organizations such as business and other enterprises maygenerate thousands—if not millions—of communications daily. Monitoringall of these communications for potential hidden messages or hiddencontent can be a challenge. Therefore, a need exists for improvedapproaches to detecting the use of steganography.

SUMMARY

The following presents a simplified summary of various aspects describedherein. This summary is not an extensive overview, and is not intendedto identify key or critical elements or to delineate the scope of theclaims. The following summary merely presents some concepts in asimplified form as an introductory prelude to the more detaileddescription provided below.

Aspects of the present disclosure provide approaches to detecting thepotential use of steganography to hide content in computer filestransmitted via electronic communications. According to various aspects,a computer-implemented method of detecting potential steganography useis provided. An electronic communication associated with a computer filemay be identified. The communication and the computer file may beanalyzed to determine whether the computer file potentially includeshidden content. To determine whether the computer file potentiallyincludes hidden content, a set of steganographic criteria may beanalyzed. If at least a portion of the steganographic criteria aresatisfied, then it may be determined that the computer file potentiallyincludes hidden content. If at least a portion of the steganographiccriteria are not satisfied, then it may be determined that the computerfile does not potentially include hidden content. If the computer fileis determined to potentially include hidden content, an individual maybe notified of the communication associated with the computer file.

The computer file may be compared to another computer file to determinewhether the steganographic criteria are satisfied. The filecharacteristics of the computer file may be compared to correspondingfile characteristics of the other computer file. File characteristicsmay include various file properties, file size, and a checksum. In someexample embodiments, the computer file may be an image file, and thefile characteristics may include an image resolution. The other computerfile may be located at a computing device from which the computer filewas sent or located from a file search service as a file search resultin a file search result set. The other computer file may be a filedownloaded via an email client or a web browser of the computing deviceand may be selected based on its filename.

The communication may be analyzed when the communication is part of acommunication trend. To determine whether the communication is part of acommunication trend, a set of trending criteria may be analyzed. If atleast a portion of the trending criteria are satisfied, then it may bedetermined that the communication is part of a communication trend. Ifat least a portion of the trending criteria are not satisfied, then itmay be determined that the communication is not part of a communicationtrend. Trending criteria may refer to the number, timeframe, timeperiod, and recipients of previous communications sent prior to thecommunication. Whether or not a computing device includes steganographyapplications may also be determined.

A steganalysis system having a processor, data store, communicationanalyzer, file analyzer, and computing device analyzer is also providedto detect the potential use of steganography as described above.Non-transitory computer-readable media having computer-executableinstructions that, when executed by a processor of a steganalysissystem, cause the steganalysis system to perform steps for detectingpotential use of steganography are also provided. These and otheraspects will be appreciated with the benefit of the detailed descriptionprovided below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example operating environment in whichvarious aspects of the disclosure may be implemented.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of example workstations and servers that maybe used to implement the processes and functions of one or more aspectsof the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example computer system that includes an exampleof an implementation of a steganalysis system.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of example method steps for detecting thepotential use of steganography to hide content in an electroniccommunication.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of example method steps for determining whether anetwork traffic incident corresponds to a communication trend.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of example method steps for determining whether acommunication potentially involves the use of steganography through ananalysis of a computer file associated with the communication.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of example method steps for locating a file forcomparison with a file associated with a communication in order todetect potential use of steganography.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of example method steps for comparing a file to afile associated with a communication to detect potential use ofsteganography.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart of example method steps for analyzing the fileproperties of a file to detect the potential use of steganography.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of example method steps for analyzing an emailcommunication to detect potential use of steganography.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Aspects of the present disclosure are directed towards investigating theuse of steganography. In particular, aspects of the present disclosureare directed towards detecting the potential use of steganography tohide content in computer files included in electronic communications.Stated differently, the present disclosure describes example approachesfor identifying electronic communications associated with computer filesthat potentially contain content hidden using steganographic techniques.Steganography may be detected through an analysis of the communication.The analysis of the communication may include an analysis of the senderof the communication, the computing device at which the communicationoriginated, the computer file associated with the communication, andother communications that may share a common characteristic with thecommunication in question. When a computer file is determined topotentially include content hidden through steganography, the electroniccommunication associated with that file may be flagged for furtherinvestigation. Electronic communications may be employed to transmitcomputer files between locations. In this regard, an electroniccommunication may be described as including or having a computer file ormay be described as being associated with a computer file beingtransmitted.

It will be appreciated that the steganalysis techniques described belowmay not identify every instance of the use of steganography and may flagsome communications that do not involve the use of steganography. Thesteganalysis techniques described below, however, may advantageouslyidentify electronic communications that potentially involve the use ofsteganography thereby allowing for further investigation of thecommunication or the individual that sent the communication. Moreparticularly, the steganalysis techniques described below may identifyelectronic communications that satisfy various steganographic criteriain which the use of steganography is more likely when a criterion issatisfied relative to when the criterion is not satisfied. In this way,the steganalysis techniques advantageously allow an organization to takeremedial action upon detection of the potential use of steganography.Remedial measures may include, for example, notifying an analyst orinvestigator, applying additional steganographic techniques to verifythat content is in fact hidden in the computer file, identifying thehidden content to determine whether it includes confidential orsensitive information, decrypting the hidden content if it is encrypted,initiating disciplinary procedures against the sender of thecommunication, and other remedial procedures. Through these remedialmeasures, an organization may thus preserve the privacy, security, andintegrity of sensitive or confidential information.

In some example implementations, the principles described below may beemployed to monitor and analyze every electronic communication occurringat an organization. Monitoring and analyzing every communication,however, may involve significant amounts of computing resources. As aresult, other example implementations may analyze some but not all ofthe communications occurring at an organization. In these other exampleimplementations, a steganalysis system may employ various steganographiccriteria to identify communications that potentially involve the use ofsteganography. The steganographic criteria employed may positivelycorrelate with the potential use of steganography such that, if acriterion is satisfied, there is a greater likelihood of the use ofsteganography than if the criterion is not satisfied. As described infurther detail below, the steganographic criteria may relate to variouscharacteristics of the communication, of a computer file associated withthe communication, of sender that sent the communication, and of thecomputing device at which the communication originated.

The approaches described below may be employed to detect potentialsteganography in electronic communications through a series ofescalating analyses. In general, a steganalysis system may monitorcommunication traffic occurring at a computer system, identify anyanomalous communications, and compare the anomalous communications tosteganographic criteria to assess the likelihood that the communicationinvolves the use of steganography. If the system determines acommunication does potentially involve the use of steganography, thesystem may identify the communication to an analyst or investigator at aforensics department of the organization for further review. These andother aspects will be described in further detail below.

1. Illustrative Computer Architecture

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of steganalysis system 101 (e.g., acomputer server) in communication system 100 that may be used accordingto an illustrative embodiment of the disclosure. The system 101 may havea processor 103 for controlling overall operation of the system and itsassociated components, including RAM 105, ROM 107, input/output (I/O)module 109, and memory 115.

I/O 109 may include a microphone, keypad, touch screen, and/or stylusthrough which a user of the steganalysis system 101 may provide input,and may also include one or more of a speaker for providing audio outputand a video display device for providing textual, audiovisual and/orgraphical output. Software may be stored within memory 115 and/orstorage to provide instructions to processor 103 for enabling the system101 to perform various functions. For example, memory 115 may storesoftware used by the system 101, such as an operating system 117,application programs 119, and an associated database 121. Processor 103and its associated components may allow the system 101 to run a seriesof computer-readable instructions to detect steganography.

The system 101 may operate in a networked environment supportingconnections to one or more remote computers, such as terminals 141 and151. The terminals 141 and 151 may be personal computers or servers thatinclude many or all of the elements described above relative to thesystem 101. Alternatively, terminal 141 and/or 151 may be a data storethat is affected by the backup and retention policies stored on thesystem 101. The network connections depicted in FIG. 1 include a localarea network (LAN) 125 and a wide area network (WAN) 129, but may alsoinclude other networks. When used in a LAN networking environment, thesystem 101 is connected to the LAN 125 through a network interface oradapter 123. When used in a WAN networking environment, the system 101may include a modem 127 or other means for establishing communicationsover the WAN 129, such as the Internet 131. It will be appreciated thatthe network connections shown are illustrative and other means ofestablishing a communications link between the computers may be used.The existence of any of various well-known protocols such as TCP/IP,Ethernet, FTP, HTTP and the like is presumed.

Additionally, one or more application programs 119 used by thesteganalysis system 101 according to an illustrative embodiment of thedisclosure may include computer executable instructions for invokingfunctionality related to detecting steganography.

The steganalysis system 101 and/or terminals 141 or 151 may also bemobile terminals, such as smart phones, personal digital assistants(PDAs), etc. including various other components, such as a battery,speaker, and antennas (not shown).

The disclosure is operational with numerous other general purpose orspecial purpose computing system environments or configurations.Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/orconfigurations that may be suitable for use with the disclosure include,but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-heldor laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems,set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs,minicomputers, mainframe computers, and distributed computingenvironments that include any of the above systems or devices, and thelike.

The disclosure may be described in the general context ofcomputer-executable instructions, such as program modules, beingexecuted by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines,programs, objects, components, data structures, and the like thatperform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.The disclosure may also be practiced in distributed computingenvironments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices thatare linked, for example, through a communications network. In adistributed computing environment, program modules may be located inboth local and remote non-transitory computer-readable storage mediaincluding memory storage devices. As used in this disclosure, anon-transitory computer-readable storage medium refers to allcomputer-readable media with the sole exception being a transitory,propagating signal.

Referring to FIG. 2, an illustrative system 200 for implementing methodsaccording to the present disclosure is shown. As illustrated, system 200may include one or more workstations 201. Workstations 201 may bevarious types of computing devices, e.g., desktop computers, laptopcomputers, servers, and so forth and may be local or remote, and areconnected by one or more communications links 202 to computer network203 that is linked via communications links 205 to the steganalysissystem 204. In certain embodiments, workstations 201 may be utilized byusers of an organization to create and send messages, receive messages,and perform other computing-related activities. In system 200, thesteganalysis system 204 may be any suitable server, processor, computer,or data processing device, or combination of the same.

Computer network 203 may be any suitable computer network including theInternet, an intranet, a wide-area network (WAN), a local-area network(LAN), a wireless network, a digital subscriber line (DSL) network, aframe relay network, an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network, avirtual private network (VPN), or any combination of any of the same.Communications links 202 and 205 may be any communications linkssuitable for communicating between workstations 201 and the steganalysissystem 204, such as network links, dial-up links, wireless links,hard-wired links, etc.

The disclosure that follows in the figures may be implemented by one ormore of the components in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 and/or other components,including other computing devices.

2. Illustrative Steganalysis System and Steganalysis Techniques

As noted above, systems and methods for performing steganalysis todetect the potential use of steganography are provided. The disclosuresset forth below describe various approaches to detecting the potentialuse of steganography in computer files associated with electroniccommunications. The example approaches will first be described asgeneral steps for detecting the use of steganography. Some of thesesteps will then be described in further detail to note and describevarious sub-steps. It will be appreciated that the steps for detectingthe potential use of steganography set forth below are described by wayof example only. Accordingly, one or more of the steps may be optionallyperformed, various combinations of steps may be selectively performed,and the steps may be performed in an order other than the example orderset forth in the accompanying figures.

Referring now to FIG. 3, an example of an implementation of a computersystem 300 of an organization is shown. The system 300 may exchangecommunications with various internal resources as well as variousexternal resources via a wide area network 302 such as e.g., theInternet. The system 300 may monitor electronic communications 304 a and304 b (collectively 304) received at and transmitted from variousworkstations 306 of the system. The communications 304 may include,e.g., email communications 304 a and web communications 304 b.Accordingly, the system 300 may include an email server 308 thattransmits and receives email communications 304 a as well as a webserver 310 that transmits and receives web communications 304 b aretransmitted and received. The email server 308 may include a data store312 that stores emails 314 and any email attachments 316 associated withthe emails. Email attachments 316 may include computer files such as,e.g., image files, audio files, video files, archive files, documentfiles, presentation files, spreadsheet files, and so forth. Additionaltypes of network communications and computer files will be appreciated.

The system 300 may include a network traffic monitoring system 318 tomonitor and analyze ingoing and outgoing network traffic. Accordingly,the network traffic monitoring system 318 may be a proxy server orgateway through which the ingoing and outgoing communications 304 passwhen respectively received at and transmitted from the system 300. Inthis regard, the network traffic monitoring system 318 may be a dataloss prevention and security solution that protects confidential andsensitive data of an organization.

The network traffic monitoring system 318 may include a network trafficmonitor 320 that analyzes the network traffic of the system 300. Thenetwork traffic monitor 320 may employ a customizable network trafficruleset (not shown) when analyzing the communications 304. If thecommunication satisfies one or more rules of the network trafficruleset, the network traffic monitor 320 may generate a network incidentassociated with the communication. As an example, the network trafficruleset may be selectively configured such that the network trafficmonitor 320 generates an incident when an outgoing email attachment oruploaded file exceeds a predetermined file size, e.g., five megabytes(MB). The network traffic monitoring system 318 may thus include a datastore 322 to store records 324 of the network incidents. The incidentrecords 324 may include information about the communication 304, e.g.,the rule that triggered the communication, the sender of thecommunication, the recipient of the communication, and other informationrelated to the communication. Suitable network traffic monitoringsystems 318 that include at least some of the features described aboveare commercially available.

An enterprise may also employ a workstation monitoring system 326 tomonitor the computing activities occurring at the workstations 306. Theworkstation monitoring system 326 may store a respective workstationprofile 328 for each workstation 306 of the system 300. The workstationprofile 328 may include, e.g., a list of applications 330 installed at acorresponding workstation 306. Suitable workstation monitoring systemsthat include at least some of these features may also be commerciallyavailable.

As noted above, a workstation 306 may include various applications suchas e.g., an email client 332 and a web browser 334 for sending andreceiving email communications 304 a and web communications 304 brespectively. The workstation 306 may also include a data store 336 thatstores, among others, files 338 downloaded via the email client 332 orthe web browser 334. The downloaded files 338 may include, for example,email attachments downloaded from an email, temporary web filesautomatically downloaded through the course of regular web browsing, andfiles actively retrieved from a remote network resource, e.g., via a URLover the Internet. A web browsing history may identify any files 338downloaded via the web browser 334 and an email history may identify anyfiles 338 downloaded via the email client 332.

The system 300, in this example, additionally includes a steganalysissystem 340 to detect the use of potential steganography to hide content341 in computer files 343 (“files”) respectively associated with thecommunications 304. The hidden content 341 may be, e.g., text-basedmessages, archived files, images, and the like. As an example,steganographic techniques may be employed to hide one image withinanother image. As another example, steganographic techniques may beemployed to hide an archive file (e.g., a ZIP) file within an image filesuch that image is displayed when the user opens the image file in animage viewer, and the contents of the archive file are displayed whenthe user opens the image file at an archive viewer. These and othersteganographic techniques will be appreciated.

As described in further detail below, the steganalysis system 340 maydetect potential steganography based, at least in part, on computerfiles 343 associated with electronic communications, e.g., emailattachments 316 associated with email communications 304 a or fileuploads associated with web communications 304 b. As also describedfurther below, the steganalysis system may also detect potentialsteganography based in part on various characteristics associated withthe electronic communications, e.g., communication patterns associatedwith the sender of the communication. Accordingly, the steganalysissystem may be in signal communication with the network trafficmonitoring system 318, the workstation monitoring system 326, and theworkstations 306 themselves. The steganalysis system 340, in thisexample, includes an incident analyzer 342, a file analyzer 344, and aworkstation analyzer 346. The steganalysis system 340 may collectivelyutilize these components to detect the potential use of steganography inthe communications 304. The incident analyzer 342 may analyze theincident records 324 of the network traffic monitoring system 318 aswell as the communications 304 respectively associated with theincidents. In this regard, the incident analyzer 342 may also bereferred to as a communication analyzer. The file analyzer 344 mayanalyze the files 343 respectively associated with the communications304, e.g., email attachments 316 and downloaded files 338. Theworkstation analyzer 346 may analyze the workstations 306 and theircorresponding workstation profiles 328 and activities via theworkstation monitoring system 326. Because the workstation 306 refers toa computing device, the workstation analyzer 346 may also be referred toas a computing device analyzer. As discussed in further detail below,the file analyzer 344 may compare a file 343 to a target file 345 inorder to determine whether the file includes content 341 hidden usingsteganography. The target file 345 may be stored in the data store 348of the steganalysis system 340 for use during the steganographydetection process. The steganalysis system 340 may retrieve a targetfile 345 from, e.g., a workstation 306 of the computer system 300 or aresource external to the computer system and accessible via the network302.

The workstation analyzer 346 may analyze the workstations 306 of thesystem 300 as well as the respective workstation profiles 328 of theworkstations. In some example implementations, the steganalysis system340 may include a data store 348 that stores a list of knownsteganography applications 350. As described further below, installationof a steganalysis tool at a workstation 306 may positively correlatewith the potential use of steganography. Accordingly, the steganalysissystem 340 may compare the list of known steganography applications 350to the list of applications 330 installed at the workstation 306. Asalso described in further detail below, steganographic criteria mayinclude trending criteria 352 and communication criteria 354, which maybe stored at the data store 348 of the steganalysis system 340. Thetrending criteria 352 and the communication criteria 354 may beimplemented as, for example, a ruleset similar to the network trafficruleset discussed above.

The steganalysis system 340 may also be in signal communication via thenetwork 302 with a file search service such as, e.g., an image searchservice 356 as shown by way of example in FIG. 3. Suitable image searchservices may be freely available over the Internet. The steganalysissystem 340 may thus submit an image search query to the image searchservice 356. The image search service 356 may be configured to locateimages based on, e.g., a filename, image metadata, or the actual contentof the image through image recognition techniques. Accordingly, thesteganalysis system 340 may submit an image search query that includes afilename, one or more image metadata values, an image file, orcombinations of such. The image search service 356 may return a set ofimage search results. The image search results may contain one or moreimages that the image search service 356 identifies as matching theimage in the search query. The steganalysis system 340 may then selectone or more of the image search results to use when analyzing an imageto detect potential steganography. The steganalysis system 340 may beconfigured to automatically select one or more of the image searchresults or, additionally or alternatively, may receive one or more ofthe image search results in response to manual selection by a user. Itwill be appreciated that the file search service may be configured tosearch for and locate other types of computer files such as audio files,video files, and the like. Accordingly, the file search service mayadditionally or alternatively be an audio search service, a video searchservice, a general computer file search service, and combinations ofsuch.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart 400 of example method steps for detecting thepotential use of steganography to hide content 341 in an electroniccommunication 304. The example method steps shown in FIG. 4 provide ageneral overview of the process of detecting potential steganography. Asnoted above, steganographic techniques may hide content 341 in varioustypes of computer files 343 such as image files, audio files, videofiles, and the like. By way of example only, the example steganalysistechniques set forth below are described in the context of image filesthat potentially contain content 341 hidden using steganography. It willbe appreciated, however, that one or more of the techniques describedbelow may be employed to detect potential steganography for other typesof computer files.

In some example implementations, the process of detecting potentialsteganography may include three stages: a network incident detectionstage, a trending analysis stage, and a communication analysis stage.During the network incident detection stage, the network trafficmonitoring system 318 may monitor incoming and outgoing network trafficat a computer system (block 402). As noted above, the network trafficmonitoring system 318 may employ a network traffic ruleset to generatenetwork traffic incidents when a communication 304 satisfies one or morerules of the network traffic ruleset. For steganography detection, thenetwork traffic ruleset may be configured to generate network trafficincidents upon detection of communications 304 associated with acomputer file 343 having a file size that exceeds a predetermined filesize threshold, e.g., at least 5 MB. If the network traffic monitor 320detects a communication 304 that satisfies a rule of the ruleset (e.g.,a file size rule), then the network traffic monitor may generate anetwork traffic incident in response (block 404). The network trafficmonitor 320 may create an incident record 324 corresponding to thenetwork traffic incident and store the incident record at the data store322 of the network traffic monitoring system 318.

During the trending analysis stage, the steganalysis system 340 mayutilize the incident analyzer 342 to analyze the incident records 324and determine whether a detected network traffic incident and itsassociated communication correspond to a communication trend (block406). As used in this disclosure, a communication trend refers to atleast two communications 304 that share a common characteristic. When anetwork traffic incident corresponds to a communication trend, thecommunication 304 associated with the incident may be described as beingpart of the communication trend. To determine whether a network trafficincident corresponds to a communication trend, the incident analyzer 342may utilize a set a trending criteria 352. The incident analyzer 342 mayanalyze the incident in question along with one or more previous networktraffic incidents by comparing the network traffic incidents to the setof trending criteria 352. The incident analyzer 342 may, for example,select previous network traffic incidents associated with the sender ofthe incident in question. A sender may be uniquely identified by, forexample, an email address, a network address (e.g., an IP address), andother types of identifiers that uniquely identify a sender. Based on theanalysis of the incident in question as well as any previous networktraffic incidents, the incident analyzer 342 may determine whether ornot the incident in question corresponds to a communication trend.

The set of trending criteria 352 may include a criterion that, whensatisfied, indicates a communication 304 is more likely to correspond toa communication trend than when the criterion is not satisfied. Theincident analyzer 342 may determine the incident in question correspondsto a communication trend when the incident or the communication 304associated with the incident satisfy one or more of the trendingcriteria 352. The incident analyzer 342 may be configured to determinethat the incident in question corresponds to a communication trend whensome but not all of the trending criteria 352 are satisfied. Theincident analyzer 342 may also be configured to determine that theincident in question does not correspond to a communication trend eventhough some of the trending criteria 352 are satisfied. As an example,if the trending set of criteria includes five total trending criterions,the incident analyzer 342 may determine the incident in questioncorresponds to a communication trend when the incident or communication304 associated with the incident satisfies three or more of the fivetotal trending criterions. The incident analyzer 342, in this example,may also determine that the incident in question does not correspond toa communication trend when the incident or communication 304 satisfy twoor less of the five total trending criteria. Additional and alternativeapproaches may be selectively employed to determine when an incident inquestion corresponds to a communication trend. As used in thisdisclosure, a set of criteria refers to a collection of one or morecriterions.

The trending criteria 352 may relate to various characteristics of theincident in question or the communication 304 associated with theincident. As one example, the set trending criteria 352 may include acriterion directed towards the frequency of previous network trafficincidents, in particular, whether a predetermined number of incidentshave occurred within a predetermined timeframe, e.g., three totalincidents within the previous month. As another example, the set oftrending criteria 352 may include a criterion directed towards theconsistency of the recipients, in particular, whether the percentage ofcommunications 304 sent to the same recipient exceeds a predeterminedthreshold, e.g., whether 50% of the communications associated with theprevious incidents were sent to a common recipient, e.g., the samerecipient. The set of trending criteria 352 may further includecriterions directed towards other characteristics that an incident orcommunication 304 in question share with the previous incidents. Theincident analyzer 342 may determine, for example, whether the previousincidents consistently occur at a common time period (e.g., everyFriday, the last Friday of every month, and so forth). In response todetermining that the previous incidents or previous communicationssatisfy one or more of the trending criteria 352, the incident analyzer342 may determine that a network traffic incident in questioncorresponds to a communication trend. Additional or alternative trendingcriteria may be selectively employed to determine whether a networktraffic incident in question corresponds to a communication trend.

Referring back to FIG. 4, if the incident analyzer 342 determines thatthe network traffic incident in question does not correspond to acommunication trend (block 408:N)—i.e., that the communication 304 isnot a communication beyond what would normally be expected—then thesteganalysis system 340 may dismiss the incident (block 410). It will beappreciated, however, that the network traffic monitoring system 318 maymaintain the incident record 324 for the incident so that thesteganalysis system 340 may subsequently analyze the incident todetermine if a subsequent network traffic incident corresponds to acommunication trend. Stated differently, although the steganalysissystem 340 may dismiss a network traffic incident, the dismissed networktraffic incident may be part of a communication trend subsequentlyidentified through an analysis of a subsequent network traffic incident.

On the other hand, if the incident analyzer 342 determines that thenetwork traffic incident in question does correspond to a communicationtrend (block 408:Y), then the steganalysis system 340 may move on to thecommunication analysis stage. During the communication analysis stage,the steganalysis system 340 analyzes the communication 304 associatedwith the incident (block 412) to determine whether the communicationpotentially includes content 341 hidden through steganography. Todetermine whether the communication 304 potentially involves the use ofsteganography, the file analyzer 344 may utilize a set of communicationcriteria 354 when analyzing the communication. The file analyzer 344 mayanalyze the communication associated with the incident in question andcompare various file characteristics to the communication criteria 354.Based on the analysis of the communication 304, the file analyzer 344may determine whether or not to escalate the incident for furtherinvestigation due to a likelihood of steganography use. Thecommunication criteria 354 may include a criterion that, when satisfied,indicates a communication 304 is more likely to involve the use ofsteganography than when the criterion is not satisfied. The fileanalyzer 344 may determine that the communication 304 in questionpotentially involves the use of steganography when the communicationsatisfies one or more of the communication criteria 354. The fileanalyzer 344 may also be configured to determine communication 304 inquestion potentially involves the use of steganography when thecommunication satisfies some but not all of the communication criteria354. Like the incident analyzer 342, the file analyzer 344 may beconfigured to determine that a communication 304 in question does notpotentially involve the use of steganography even when some of thecommunication criteria 354 are satisfied. Additional or alternativeapproaches may be selectively employed to determine when a communication304 in question potentially involves the use of steganography.

The communication criteria 354 may relate to the communication 304itself as well as a computer file 343 associated with the communication.As one example, the communication criteria 354 may include a criteriondirected towards the file characteristics of the computer file 343associated with the communication 304. File characteristics may include,e.g., file properties, file size, a checksum, and other types of filecharacteristics. File properties may include, e.g., a created-onproperty, a created-by property, a modified-on property, a modified-byproperty, and other types of file properties. If the computer file 343is an image file, then the file characteristics may also include animage resolution. The checksum may be, e.g., an MD5 checksum generatedby an MD5 hashing function. As noted above, the communication 304 may bean email communication 304 a. Accordingly, the communication criteria354 may also include a criterion directed towards whether the emailcommunication 304 a is an original email communication or a forwardedemail communication. Additional or alternative communication criteria354 may be selectively employed to determine that a communication 304 inquestion potentially involves the use of steganography. The use ofcommunication criteria 354 to identify communications 304 thatpotentially involve the use of steganography will be discussed infurther detail below.

If the steganalysis system 340 determines that a communication 304 inquestion does not potentially involve the use of steganography (block414:N), then the steganalysis system may dismiss the incident associatedwith the communication (block 410) as described above. If, however, thesteganalysis system 340 determines that a communication 304 in questiondoes potentially involve the use of steganography (block 414:Y), thenthe steganalysis system may escalate the incident for furtherinvestigation (block 416). Escalating the incident may include, e.g.,automatically sending a notification such as an email to an analyst orinvestigator identifying the incident and the associated communication304 in question. Escalating the incident may additionally oralternatively include, e.g., automatically creating an issue ticket inan issue tracking system and assigning the new issue ticket to theanalyst or investigator.

As also noted above, the steganalysis system 340 is configured toidentify communications 304 where the potential use of steganography tohide content warrants further investigation. Accordingly, individualimplementations of the steganalysis system 340 may differ with respectto the probability threshold that warrants further investigation of acommunication 304. the probability threshold may be an absolute numberof satisfied criteria, a percentage of satisfied criteria, or collectivesatisfaction of a particular subset of criteria. The probabilitythreshold may depend, e.g., on the circumstances in which thesteganalysis system 340 is implemented, a desired level of security, theneeds of an organization implementing the system, and so forth. Theexample steganalysis system 340 provided is advantageously designed tobe flexible in its implementation through the use of communicationcriteria 354 that indicate the potential use of steganography in acommunication 304. As discussed in further detail below, thecommunication criteria 354 may be directed towards a computer fileassociated with the communication 304 (e.g., an email attachment oruploaded file) as well as the workstation at which the communicationoriginated. The steganalysis system 340 may thus be selectivelyconfigured to meet the particular needs of an organization based on thetype and amount of communication criteria 354 employed to identifypotential steganography. For example, some implementations may identifypotential steganography when a communication 304 in question satisfiesrelatively more communication criteria 354 while other implementationsmay identify potential steganography when a communication in questionsatisfies relatively less communication criteria 354. Furthermore, theoperation of the steganalysis system 340 may be updated and customizedas needed by adding new communication criteria or modifying existingcommunication criteria.

In some example implementations, the steganalysis system 340 may beconfigured to initiate processing of an incident and its correspondingcommunication 304 as soon as the network traffic monitoring system 318generates the incident. In other example implementations, thesteganalysis system 340 may be configured to periodically query the datastore 322 of the network traffic monitoring system 318 for new incidentrecords 324, e.g., on a daily basis. Moreover, the steganalysis system340 may be configured to analyze incident records 324 and associatedcommunications 304 during periods of reduced activity at the computersystem 300, e.g., every night at midnight. In this way, the steganalysissystem 340 may avoid interfering with the transmission of communications304 during regular business hours.

Turning now to FIG. 5, a flowchart 500 of example method steps fordetermining whether a network traffic incident corresponds to acommunication trend is shown. The trending analysis process may betriggered when the network traffic monitoring system 318 generates anetwork traffic incident (block 502). The incident analyzer 342 of thesteganalysis system 340 may access the incident records 324 stored atthe network traffic monitoring system 318 to determine whether anyprevious incidents have occurred. Accordingly, the incident analyzer 342may query the data store 322 for any incident records 324 associatedwith the sender of the communication that triggered the incident inquestion. If the incident analyzer 342 determines that there are noprevious incidents (block 506:N), then the incident analyzer maydetermine that the incident in question is not associated with acommunication trend and dismiss the incident (block 508).

If, however, the incident analyzer 342 determines that there areprevious incidents (block 506:Y), then the incident analyzer maydetermine whether the total number of previous incidents exceeds apredetermined threshold within a predetermined time period (block 510),e.g., three incidents within the previous month. If the incidentanalyzer 342 determines that the previous incidents do not exceed thepredetermined frequency threshold (block 512:N), then the incidentanalyzer may determine that the incident in question does not correspondto a communication trend and dismiss the incident (block 508). Thepredetermined frequency threshold may be selectively configured invarious implementations. If, however, the incident analyzer 342determines that the previous incidents do exceed the predeterminedfrequency threshold (block 512:Y), then the incident analyzer maycontinue its analysis of the incident in question.

For example, the incident analyzer 342 may perform one or more of thefollowing steps to analyze the incident in question. The incidentanalyzer 342 may identify patterns regarding the respective recipientsof the communications 304 associated with the incidents (block 514). Asnoted above, the incident analyzer 342 may determine whether asignificant percentage of the communications 304 are sent to the samerecipient. The incident analyzer 342 may also identify patternsregarding the timeframe in which the communications 304 are sent (block516). As also noted above, the incident analyzer may determine whether asignificant percentage of the communications 304 are sent at the same ora similar time, e.g., every Friday, the last Friday of every month, andother frequency patterns.

In some example implementations, the steganalysis system 340 maydetermine whether the workstation 306 at which a communication 304originated includes steganography applications (block 518), e.g.,steganography applications, steganography software, and other types ofapplications for hiding content in computer files using steganographictechniques. For example, that steganalysis system 340 may utilize theworkstation analyzer 346 to access the workstation profile 328 stored atthe workstation monitoring system 326. The workstation analyzer 346 maythen compare the list of steganography applications 350 to the list ofapplications 330 installed or residing at the workstation 306. In thisway, the workstation analyzer 346 may determine whether the workstation306 that originated the communication 304 in question includesapplications for hiding content through steganography. If theworkstation analyzer 346 determines a steganography application isinstalled at the workstation 306, the workstation analyzer may, in someexample implementations, analyze the user that installed theapplication. In particular, the workstation analyzer 346 may determinewhether an administrator or the workstation user installed thesteganography application. In some example implementations, theworkstation analyzer 346 may determine that a steganography applicationinstalled by the workstation user (rather than an administrator)positively correlates with the potential use of steganography to hidecontent in the computer file.

Through these various steps, the steganalysis system 340 may collecttrend analysis information (block 520). The trend analysis informationmay individually or collectively indicate whether the incident inquestions corresponds to a communication trend. Accordingly, thesteganalysis system 340 may perform one, some, or all of these examplesteps as well as additional or alternative steps to collect trendanalysis information. If the steganalysis system 340 determines that thetrend analysis information does not indicate a communication trend(block 522:N), then the steganalysis system may dismiss the incident inquestion (block 508). If, however, the steganalysis system 340determines that the trend analysis information does indicate acommunication trend (block 522:Y), then the steganalysis system maycontinue its analysis of the incident (block 524). The trend analysisinformation may include, e.g., one or more of numeric values, true orfalse values, and other types of information indicating whether thecriterions of the trending criteria 352 are satisfied or not satisfied.

In FIG. 6, a flowchart 600 of example method steps for determiningwhether a communication potentially involves the use of steganographythrough an analysis of a computer file 343 associated with thecommunication is shown. As noted above in FIG. 5, the steganalysissystem 340 may continue analysis of a communication 304 when thesteganalysis system determines the communication corresponds to acommunication trend (block 602). As also noted above, the communication304 may include content 341 hidden in a computer file 343 associatedwith the communication. For illustrative purposes, the computer file 343may thus be referred to as the suspect computer file. In this respect,the steganalysis system 340 may select the suspect computer file 343associated with the communication 304 of the incident for furtheranalysis (block 604). In general, the steganalysis system 340 may detectthe use of steganography through a comparison of the suspect file 343 toa target file 345 that is known not to include hidden content 341. Ifthe file characteristics of the suspect file 343 match the filecharacteristics of the target file 345, then the steganalysis system 340may determine that the suspect file 343 does not potentially includecontent hidden using steganography. If, however, the filecharacteristics of the suspect file 343 do not match the filecharacteristics of the target file 345, then the steganalysis system 340may determine that the suspect file 343 potentially includes contenthidden using steganography.

Referring back to FIG. 6, the steganalysis system 340 may locate atarget file 345 for comparison to the suspect file 343 (block 606). Thesteganalysis system 340 may locate the target file 345 at theworkstation 306 where the communication 304 originated or from anexternal source such as an image search service 356 accessible via,e.g., the Internet. In this regard, the target file 345 may be adownloaded file 338 residing at the workstation 306, or a similar image358 located using the image search service 356. If the steganalysissystem 340 cannot successfully locate a target file 345 for comparison(block 608:N), then the steganalysis system may dismiss the incident(block 610). If, however, the steganalysis system 340 does successfullylocate a target file 345 for comparison to the suspect file 343 (block608:Y), then the file analyzer 344 may analyze the suspect file 343 andthe target file and compare their respective file characteristics (block612). If the file analyzer 344 determines that the file characteristicsmatch (block 614:Y), then the file analyzer may determine that thesuspect file 343 does not include content 341 hidden using steganographyand dismiss the incident (block 610).

If, however, the file analyzer 344 determines that the filecharacteristics of the suspect file 343 and the target file 345 do notmatch (block 614:N), then the file analyzer may determine that thesuspect file potentially includes content 341 hidden using steganographyand flag the communication 304 associated with the suspect file 343(block 616). Having flagged the communication 343 as potentiallyinvolving the use of steganography, the steganalysis system 340 mayescalate the incident associated with the communication for furtherinvestigation (block 618) as described above. Locating a target file 345and comparing file characteristics will be discussed in further detailbelow with reference to FIG. 7 and FIG. 8 respectively.

It will be appreciated that the communication 304 and its associatedfile 343 need not satisfy every criterion in the set of communicationcriteria 354 for the file analyzer 344 to determine the suspect filepotentially involves the use of steganography. The file analyzer 344 ofthe steganalysis system 340 may determine that a suspect file 343potentially involves the use of steganography when only a portion of thecommunication criteria 354 are satisfied. Likewise, the file analyzer344 may determine that a suspect file 343 does not potentially involvethe use of steganography even when some of the communication criteria354 are satisfied. The file analyzer 344 may be selectively configuredto determine that a suspect communication does or does not potentiallyinvolve the use of steganography when relatively more or less of thecommunication criteria 354 are satisfied. In this way, operation of thesteganalysis system 340 remains flexible according to the needs andpreferences of individual circumstances.

Referring now to FIG. 7, a flowchart 700 of example method steps forlocating a target file 345 for comparison to a suspect file 343 isshown. Upon selection of a suspect file 343 for further analysis (block702), the steganalysis system 340 may attempt to locate a target file345 for comparison to the suspect file 343. The target file 345 may be afile that initially appears to match the suspect file. As noted abovewith reference to FIG. 6, the steganalysis system 340 may determine thatthe suspect file 343 potentially includes hidden content 341 when atleast some of the file characteristics of the suspect file do not matchthe corresponding file characteristics of the target file 345. To locatea candidate target file 345, the steganalysis system 340 may look tolocations both internal and external to the computer system 300. Forexample, the steganalysis system 340 may query the workstation 306 wherethe communication 304 associated with the suspect file 343 originated.The steganalysis system 340 may review the web browsing history of theworkstation and examine any files 338 download through the web browser334 of the workstation (block 704). If the steganalysis system 340locates a downloaded file that appears to match the suspect file 343(block 706:Y), then the steganalysis system may select the downloadedfile as the target file 345 for comparison to the suspect file (block708).

If the steganalysis system 340 does not locate a candidate target file345 in the web history of the workstation 306 (block 706:N), thesteganalysis system may examine the files 338 downloaded through theemail client 332 as email attachments (block 710). If the steganalysissystem 340 locates a candidate file that appears to match the suspectfile 343 (block 712:Y), then the steganalysis system may select thedownloaded email attachment 338 as the target file 345 for comparison tothe suspect file (block 714). The steganalysis system 340 may locate andidentify a candidate target file 345 based, e.g., on the filename, fileproperties, file size, and combinations of such. For example, if thefilename of the suspect file 343 matches (or is similar to) the filenameof a candidate target file, then the steganalysis system 340 may selectthe candidate target file having the matching or similar filename as thetarget file 345 to compare to the suspect file.

If the steganalysis system 340 cannot locate a candidate target file 345at the workstation 306 where the communication 304 originated (block712:N), then the steganalysis system may look to a source external tothe computer system 300. The steganalysis system 340 may, for example,query an image search service 356 for an image that matches the suspectimage 343 (block 716). As noted above, the image search service 356 maylocate candidate images based on the filename of the suspect image 343,the content of the suspect image, and combinations of such. If the imagesearch service 356 locates a candidate image 358 (block 718:Y), then theimage search service may provide the candidate image to the steganalysissystem 340, and the steganalysis system may select the candidate image358 as the target image 345 for comparison to the suspect image 343(block 720). If the image search service cannot locate a candidate image758, then the steganalysis system 340 may dismiss the incidentassociated with the communication having the suspect image 343 (block722).

It will be appreciated that the image search service 356 may locatemultiple candidate images 358 based on the query from the steganalysissystem 340. In this circumstance, selection of one of the candidateimages 358 as the target image 345 may be done manually orautomatically. As an example, the steganalysis system 340 may beconfigured to pause the steganalysis process and notify an analyst orinvestigator that multiple candidate images have been identified ascandidate images. The steganalysis process may remain paused until theanalyst or investigator manually selects one of the candidate images andmay continue upon selection of one of the candidate images by theanalyst or investigator. In this way, the analyst or investigator mayadvantageously review the suspect image 343 and the candidate images todetermine which candidate image best matches the suspect image. Thesteganalysis system 340 may notify the analyst or investigator via emailor through creation of a new issue ticket in an issue tracking system asdescribed above. The steganalysis system 340 may also include a userinterface that presents the suspect image 343 and candidate images alongwith input elements permitting selection of one of the candidate imagesas the target image 345. It will be also appreciated that thesteganalysis system may be similarly configured to compare audio files,video files, document files, and other types of computer files.

In some example implementations, the network traffic monitoring system318 may maintain a cache (not shown) of all image received at thecomputing system 300. When the system 300 receives an inboundcommunication 304, the communication may first pass through the networktraffic monitoring system 318. Before the network traffic monitoringsystem 318 forwards a communication 304 to the intended workstation 306of the recipient, the network traffic monitoring system may save a copyof any images associated with the communication in a global image cache.For example, the network traffic monitoring system 318 may save one copyof each image received at the system 300 as part of ordinary webcommunications 340 b. The network traffic monitoring system 318 maylikewise store copies of other types of computer files received at thecomputer system 300. The steganalysis system 340 may thus be configured,in some example implementations, to look to the image cache of thenetwork traffic monitoring system 318 when attempting to locate a targetfile 345 for comparison to a suspect file 343.

Comparing a suspect image 343 to a target image 345 may provide insightinto to the potential use of steganography to hide content in thesuspect image. For example, if the suspect image 343 and the targetimage 345 have matching image resolutions, but the file size of thesuspect image is larger than the file size of the target image, this maybe an indication that the suspect image potentially includes contenthidden through steganography. Another indication of the potential use ofsteganography to hide content in an image may be the circumstance inwhich the suspect image 343 has a file size larger than what would beexpected based on its image resolution. Even if the suspect image 343and the target image 345 have matching image resolutions and file sizes,a mismatched checksum may also indicate the potential use ofsteganography to hide content in the suspect image. It will beappreciated that minor differences between the suspect image 343 and thetarget image 345 may result in relatively small differences inrespective file size. Accordingly, the steganalysis system 340 in someexample implementations may employ a predetermined difference thresholdsuch that the steganography system determines that a suspect image 343potentially involves the use of steganography when a file sizedifference exceeds the difference threshold and determines that thesuspect image does not potentially involve the use of steganography whenthe file size difference does not exceed the difference threshold. Thedifference threshold may be an absolute file size difference, e.g., 100kilobytes (KB), or a percentage file size difference (e.g., 25%).

In FIG. 8, a flowchart 800 of example method steps for comparing asuspect image 343 to a target image 345 in order to detect the potentialuse of steganography to hide content in the suspect image is shown. Asnoted above, the file comparison process is described by way of examplein the context of image files. The principles set forth below, however,may be applied to other types of computer files, e.g., audio files,video files, and so forth. Having identified a target file 345 forcomparison to a suspect file 343 (block 802), the file analyzer 344 ofthe steganalysis system 340, in this example, may determine and comparethe respective image resolutions of the suspect image and the targetimage (block 804). Image resolution may refer to, e.g., the height andwidth of an image file in screen pixels or in printed dots per inch(dpi).

If the image resolution of the suspect image 343 does not match theimage resolution of the target image 345 (block 806:N), then the fileanalyzer 344 may determine whether the image resolution of the suspectimage is higher or lower than the image resolution of the target file(block 808). If the image resolution of the suspect image 343 is lessthan the image resolution of the target image 345 (block 808:N), thenthe steganalysis system 340 may determine that the suspect image 343does not potentially include content hidden using steganography anddismiss the incident for the communication 304 having the suspect image(block 810). If, however, the image resolution of the suspect image 343is higher than the image resolution of the target image (block 808:Y),then the file analyzer 344 may determine an expected file size of thesuspect image based on its image resolution (block 812). As noted above,a suspect image 343 having a file size higher than what would beexpected may be an indication of the use of steganography to hidecontent in the suspect image. It will be appreciated, however, that insome example implementations, the file analyzer 344 may determine anexpected file size of the suspect image in response to a determinationthat the image resolution of the suspect image 343 is higher or lowerthat the image resolution of the target image.

Accordingly, if the actual file size of the suspect image 343 equals theexpected file size of the suspect image (block 814:Y), the steganalysissystem 340 may determine that the suspect image 343 does not potentiallyinclude content hidden through steganography and dismiss the incidentfor the communication 304 having the suspect image (block 810). If theactual file size of the suspect image 343 does not match the expectedfile size, however, the file analyzer 344 may compute the differencebetween the actual file size and the expected file size of the suspectimage (block 816). As noted above, the steganalysis system 340 mayemploy a difference threshold and compare the file size differencebetween the actual and expected file size to the difference threshold(block 818). If the file size difference does not exceed the differencethreshold (block 820:N), then the steganalysis system 340 may determinethat the suspect image 343 does not potentially include content hiddenthrough steganography and dismiss the incident for the communication 304having the suspect image (block 810). If the file size difference doesexceed the difference threshold (block 820:Y), however, then thesteganalysis system 340 may determine that the suspect image 343potentially includes content hidden through the use of steganography andescalate the incident for the communication 304 having the suspect imagefor further investigation (block 822).

If the image resolution of the suspect file 343 matches the imageresolution of the target file 345 (block 806:Y), the suspect file maynonetheless potentially contain content hidden through the use ofsteganography. Accordingly, the file analyzer 344 may determine the filesize of the suspect image 343 and the file size of the target image 345(block 824). If the file size of the suspect image 343 does not matchthe file size of the target image 345 (block 826:N), then the fileanalyzer may determine whether the file size of the suspect image isgreater than the file size of the target image (block 828). If the filesize of the suspect image 343 is less than the file size of the targetimage 345 (block 828:N), then the steganalysis system 340 may determinethat the suspect image does not potentially include content hiddenthrough steganography and dismiss the incident for the communication 304having the suspect image (block 830). If the file size of the suspectimage 343 is greater than the file size of the target image 345 (block828), however, then the file analyzer 344 may determine the differencebetween the respective file sizes of the suspect image and the targetimage (block 832).

As also noted above, minor differences in the suspect image 343 and thetarget image 345 may result in slight variations in file size. The fileanalyzer 344 of the steganalysis system 340, in some examples, may thusemploy a difference threshold to account for such minor differencesbetween the suspect image 343 and the target image 345. The fileanalyzer 344 may thus compare the file size difference to the differencethreshold (block 834) and determine whether the file size differenceexceeds the difference threshold (block 836). If the file sizedifference does not exceed the difference threshold (block 836:N), thenthe steganalysis system 340 may determine that the suspect image 343does not potentially include content hidden through steganography anddismiss the incident for the communication 304 having the suspect image(block 838). If the file size difference does exceed the differencethreshold (block 836), however, the steganalysis system 340 maydetermine that the suspect image 343 potentially includes content hiddenthrough the use of steganography and escalate the incident for thecommunication 304 having the suspect image (block 822).

It will be appreciated that a suspect image 343 may potentially includecontent hidden through the use of steganography even when the imageresolution for the suspect image matches the image resolution of thetarget image 345 (block 806:Y) and the file size of the suspect imagematches the file size of the target image (block 826:Y). In thiscircumstance, the steganalysis system 340 may detect the potential useof steganography to hide content in the suspect image 343 based on thechecksums of the suspect image and the target image 345. Accordingly,the file analyzer 344 may compute respective checksums (e.g., an MD5checksum) for the suspect image 343 and the target image 345 (block840). If the checksum for the suspect image 343 matches the checksum forthe target image 345 (block 842:Y), then the steganalysis system 340 maydetermine that the suspect image does not likely include content hiddenthrough steganography and dismiss the incident for the communication 304having the suspect image (block 830). If, however, the checksum for thesuspect image 343 does not match the checksum for the target image 345(block 842:N), however, then the steganalysis system 340 may determinethat the suspect image potentially includes content hidden through theuse of steganography and escalate the incident for the communication 304having the suspect image (block 822).

It will be appreciated that the example method steps may be configuredand implemented for other types of computer files. Where the suspectfile 343 and the target file 345 are audio files, for example, the fileanalyzer 344 may compare various audio file properties to determinewhether a suspect audio file matches a target audio file. Comparableaudio file properties may include, e.g., an identifier for the audiocodec (encoder-decoder), the sample rate, the number of channels, thebit resolution, and other types of audio file characteristics. Where thesuspect file 343 and the target file 345 are video files the fileanalyzer may compare various video file properties to determine whethera suspect video file matches a target video file. Comparable video fileproperties may include, e.g., an identifier for the video codec, theduration, frame size (screen pixel height and width), color depth, framerate (frames per second), aspect ratio, and other types of video filecharacteristics. Comparable file properties for other types of fileswill thus be appreciated with the benefit of this disclosure.

In FIGS. 9 and 10, example method steps for implementing other types ofcriteria to determine whether a communication potentially involves theuse of steganography are shown. These example method steps may beselectively performed as part of the communication analyses described byway of example above. In FIG. 9, a flowchart 900 of example method stepsfor analyzing the file properties of a suspect file 343 is shown. Havinginitiated an analysis of a communication associated with an identifiedincident (block 902), the steganalysis system 340 may analyze the fileproperties of a suspect file 343 (block 904). The steganalysis system,in this example, may assess whether the user that sent the communication304 created or modified the suspect file. Accordingly, if the created-byor modified-by file properties identify the sender of the communication(block 906:Y), then the steganalysis system 340 may determine thesuspect file 343 potentially includes content 341 hidden usingsteganography and continue the analysis of the communication (block908). If, however, the created-by file property or modified-by fileproperty do not identify the sender of the communication 304 (block906:N), i.e., if the created-by or modified-by file properties identifyanother user other than the sender of the communication, then thesteganalysis system may determine that the suspect file 343 does notpotentially involve the use of steganography and dismiss the incident(block 910).

The steganalysis system may review other file properties such as themodification date file property to determine whether a suspect file 343potentially involves the use of steganography. Where the steganalysissystem 340 locates a matching target file 345 in the downloaded files338 of the workstation 306, for example, the file analyzer 344 maycompare the date the target file was download to the modification dateof the suspect file 343. If the sender modified the suspect file 343after the sender downloaded the target file 345, then the steganalysissystem 340 may determine that the suspect file potentially involves theuse of steganography. As another example, the steganalysis systemreviews the owner file property and the modified-by file property todetermine whether a suspect file 343 potentially involves the use ofsteganography. If these file properties indicate that the suspect file343 was modified by a user other than the owner, then the steganalysissystem 340 may determine that the suspect file potentially includescontent hidden through the use of steganography. These example steps maybe employed in combination with the steps of the example communicationanalyses described above.

In FIG. 10, a flowchart 1000 of example method steps for analyzing anemail communication 304 a are shown. Having initiated an analysis of acommunication 304 associated with an identified incident (block 1002),the steganalysis system 340 may identify the communication as an emailcommunication 304 a (block 1004). The steganalysis system 340, in thisexample, may determine whether the email communication 304 a is anoriginal email communication created by then sender or a forwarded emailcommunication that was originally created by another user (block 1006).If the email communication 304 a is a forwarded email communication, afile 343 attached to the email is less likely to have been modifiedusing steganography to hide content. Accordingly, if the emailcommunication 304 a is a forwarded email communication (block 1008:Y),the steganalysis system 340, in this example, may determine that a file343 attached to the email does not potentially include content 341hidden using steganography and dismiss the incident (block 1010). If,however, the steganalysis system 340 determines that the emailcommunication 304 a is not a forwarded email communication (block1008:N), e.g., that the email communication 304 a is an original emailcommunication created by the sender, then the steganalysis system 340may determine that the file 343 attached to the email potentiallyincludes content 341 hidden using steganography and continue analysis ofthe communication (block 1012). These example steps may be employed incombination with the steps of the example communication analysesdescribed above.

The steganalysis system and steganalysis methods described above providevarious technical advantages. As noted above, steganography relies oncomputing technology to hide content in computer files transmitted inelectronic communications. Steganalysis likewise relies on computingtechnology as a countermeasure to thwart attempts to hide content incomputer files. The example steganalysis systems and methods describedabove automate at least some of the steps in detecting the potential useof steganography to hide content in computer files. Other technicaladvantages will be appreciated with the benefit of this disclosure.

Aspects of the disclosure have been described in terms of illustrativeembodiments thereof. Numerous other embodiments, modifications andvariations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims will occurto persons of ordinary skill in the art from a review of thisdisclosure. For example, the steps illustrated in the illustrativefigures may be performed in other than the recited order, and one ormore steps illustrated may be optional in accordance with aspects of thedisclosure.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method of detectingpotential steganography use comprising: identifying an electroniccommunication associated with a computer file; determining whether toanalyze the communication for potential use of steganography to hidecontent in the computer file; analyzing a set of steganographic criteriato determine whether the computer file potentially includes hiddencontent in response to a determination to analyze the communication forpotential use of steganography; determining that the computer filepotentially includes hidden content in response to a determination thatat least a portion of the steganographic criteria are satisfied; anddetermining that the computer file does not potentially include hiddencontent in response to a determination that at least a portion of thesteganographic criteria are not satisfied.
 2. The method of claim 1wherein the computer file associated with the communication is a firstcomputer file and wherein analyzing the set of steganographic criteriaincludes: locating a second computer file based on file characteristicsof the first computer file; comparing one or more file characteristicsof the first computer file to one or more corresponding filecharacteristics of the second computer file; determining that asteganographic criterion in the set of steganographic criteria issatisfied in response to a determination that one of the filecharacteristics of the first computer file do not match thecorresponding file characteristic of the second computer file; anddetermining that the steganographic criterion is not satisfied inresponse to a determination that the file characteristic of the firstcomputer file matches the corresponding file characteristic of thesecond computer file.
 3. The method of claim 2 wherein locating thesecond computer file includes: querying a computing device from whichthe communication was sent to determine whether the second computer fileis available at the computing device; selecting the second computer filefrom the computing device in response to a determination that the secondcomputer file is available at the computing device; and in response to adetermination that the second computer file is not available at thecomputing device, querying a file search service to obtain one or morefile search results and selecting one of the file search results as thesecond computer file.
 4. The method of claim 3 wherein querying thecomputing device includes: analyzing a set of downloaded files residingat the computing device; selecting as the second computer file one ofthe downloaded files having a filename that matches a filename of thefirst computer file; and wherein the set of downloaded files includesone or more files downloaded via an email client and one or more filesdownloaded via a web browser.
 5. The method of claim 2 wherein the firstcomputer file is a first image file, the second computer file is asecond image file, and the set of steganographic criteria includes: i) afirst steganographic criterion that is satisfied when a first checksumof the first image file does not match a second checksum of the secondimage file; ii) a second steganographic criterion that is satisfied whena first image resolution of the first image file matches a second imageresolution of the second image file and a first file size of the firstimage file is larger than a second file size of the second image file;iii) a third steganographic criterion that is satisfied when the firstfile size of the first image file exceeds an expected file size that isbased on the first image resolution of the first image file; and iv) afourth steganographic criterion that is satisfied when the first filesize of the first image file is greater than the second file size of thesecond image file and a file size difference between the first file sizeand the second file size exceeds a predetermined difference threshold.6. The method of claim 2 wherein the set of steganographic criteriaincludes: i) a first steganographic criterion that is satisfied when oneor more file properties of the first computer file indicate that asender of the communication created or modified the first computer file;ii) a second steganographic criterion that is satisfied when one or moreof the file properties of the first computer file indicate that thefirst computer file was modified after the second computer file wasdownloaded to a computing device from which the first computer file wassent; and iii) a third steganographic criterion that is satisfied whenone or more of the file properties of the first computer file indicatethat the sender of the communication modified the first computer fileand indicate that an owner of the first computer file is not the senderof the communication.
 7. The method of claim 2 wherein: thecommunication is an email communication; the set of steganographiccriteria includes a steganographic criterion that is satisfied when theemail communication is an original email communication; and thesteganographic criterion is not satisfied when the email communicationis a forwarded email communication.
 8. A steganalysis system comprising:a data store that stores a set of steganographic criteria that, when atleast a portion of the steganographic criteria are satisfied, indicate acomputer file associated with an electronic communication potentiallyincludes content hidden through use of steganography; a communicationanalyzer that, in operation, analyzes the communication and determineswhether to analyze the computer file for potential use of steganography;and a file analyzer that, in operation, analyzes the computer file basedon the set of steganographic criteria and determines whether thecomputer file potentially includes hidden content.
 9. The steganalysissystem of claim 8 further comprising: a set of trending criteria storedat the data store that, when at least a portion of the trending criteriaare satisfied, indicate the communication is part of a communicationtrend; wherein the communication analyzer determines to analyze thecomputer file in response to a determination that the communication ispart of a communication trend and determines not to analyze the computerfile in response to a determination that the communication is not partof a communication trend; and wherein the communication analyzer, inoperation, analyzes the set of trending criteria to determine whetherthe communication is part of a communication trend, determines that thecommunication is part of a communication trend in response to adetermination that at least a portion of the trending criteria aresatisfied, and determines that the communication is not part of acommunication trend in response to a determination that at least aportion of the trending criteria are not satisfied.
 10. The steganalysissystem of claim 9 further comprising: a list of steganographyapplications stored at the data store; a computing device analyzer that,in operation, compares the list of steganography applications to a listof software applications residing at a computing device from which thecommunication was sent to determine whether one or more steganographyapplications reside at the computing device; and wherein thecommunication analyzer determines to analyze the computer file inresponse to a determination that the communication is part of acommunication trend and that at least one steganography applicationresides at the computing device.
 11. The steganalysis system of claim 8wherein: the computer file is a first computer file; the file analyzer,in operation, selects a second computer file for comparison to the firstcomputer file and compares one or more file characteristics of the firstcomputer file to one or more corresponding file characteristics of thesecond computer file; wherein the file analyzer determines that asteganographic criterion in the set of steganographic criteria issatisfied in response to a determination that one of the filecharacteristics of the first computer file does not match thecorresponding file characteristic of the second computer file; andwherein the file analyzer determines that the steganographic criterionis not satisfied in response to a determination that the filecharacteristic of the first file matches the corresponding filecharacteristic of the second file.
 12. The steganalysis system of claim11 wherein: the first computer file is a first image file and the secondcomputer file is a second image file; the one or more filecharacteristics of the first image file include a first imageresolution, a first image file size, and a first checksum; and thecorresponding file characteristics of the second image file include asecond image resolution, a second image size, and a second checksum. 13.The steganalysis system of claim 11 wherein: the one or more filecharacteristics of the first computer file include a set of fileproperties of the first computer file; the corresponding filecharacteristics of the second computer file include a set of fileproperties of the second computer file; and the file analyzer determineswhether a steganographic criterion in the set of steganographic criteriais satisfied based on at least one of the set of file properties of thefirst computer file, the set of file properties of the second computerfile, and combinations thereof.
 14. A non-transitory computer-readablemedium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, whenexecuted by a processor of a steganalysis system, cause the steganalysissystem to perform steps for detecting potential use of steganography,the steps comprising: identifying an electronic communication associatedwith a computer file; determining, using the processor of thesteganalysis system, whether to analyze the communication for potentialuse of steganography; analyzing, using the processor, a set ofsteganographic criteria to determine whether the computer filepotentially includes hidden content in response to a determination toanalyze the communication for potential use of steganography;determining, at the processor, that the computer file includes hiddencontent in response to a determination that at least a portion of thesteganographic criteria are satisfied; and determining, at theprocessor, that the computer file does not include hidden content inresponse to a determination that at least a portion of thesteganographic criteria are not satisfied.
 15. The computer-readablemedium of claim 14 wherein the computer-executable instructions, whenexecuted by the processor, cause the process to perform steps furthercomprising providing to an individual a notification that identifies thecommunication in response to a determination that the computer fileincludes hidden content.
 16. The computer-readable medium of claim 14wherein determining whether to analyze the communication for potentialuse of steganography includes: comparing a file size of the computerfile to a predetermined file size threshold; determining to analyze thecommunication for potential use of steganography in response to adetermination that the file size of the computer file exceeds the filesize threshold; and determining not to analyze the communication forpotential use of steganography in response to a determination that thefile size of the computer file does not exceed the file size threshold.17. The computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein determining whetherto analyze the communication for potential use of steganography furtherincludes: analyzing one or more previous communications sent prior tothe communication in order to determine whether the communication ispart of a communication trend; determining to analyze the communicationfor potential use of steganography in response to a determination thatthe file size of the computer file exceeds the file size threshold andthat the communication is part of a communication trend; and determiningnot to analyze the communication for potential use of steganography inresponse to a determination that the communication is not part of acommunication trend.
 18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17wherein analyzing the one or more previous communications includes:analyzing a set of trending criteria to determine whether thecommunication is part of a communication trend; determining that thecommunication is part of a communication trend in response to adetermination that at least a portion of the trending criteria aresatisfied; and determining that the communication is not part of acommunication trend in response to a determination that at least aportion of the trending criteria are not satisfied.
 19. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 18 wherein the set of trendingcriteria includes: i) a first trending criterion that is satisfied whena first predetermined number of the previous communications were sentduring a predetermined timeframe; ii) a second trending criterion thatis satisfied when a second predetermined number of the previouscommunications were sent to a common recipient; and iii) a thirdtrending criterion that is satisfied when a third predetermined numberof the previous communications were sent at a common time period. 20.The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein determining whether toanalyze the communication for potential steganography use includes:analyzing a computing device from which the communication was sent todetermine whether one or more steganography applications reside at thecomputing device; determining to analyze the communication for potentialuse of steganography in response to a determination that at least onesteganography application resides at the computing device; anddetermining not to analyze the communication for potential steganographyuse in response to a determination that no steganography applicationsreside at the computing device.